Summary of 2009 Corruption Survey

CORRUPTION IN ALBANIA: PERCEPTIONS AND EXPERIENCE  

CORRUPTION PERCEPTION: The perception of corruption in Albania remains high. Out of 20 institutions rated by the general public in the 2009 survey, 14 are considered to be more corrupt than honest and only 6 fall below the midpoint of a scale where 0 means “Very honest” and 100 means “Very corrupt”. Religious leaders, the President, media, military, public school teachers and NGO leaders are perceived as least corrupt. Custom officials, tax officials, ministers, parliamentarians and doctors, on the other hand, are perceived as the most corrupt. About half of the general public sample (48.5%) thinks that corruption has increased compared to a year ago, while 38% think it has remained at the same level.

CORRUPTION EXPERIENCE: In general, the overall experience with corruption transactions has declined from 2005 to 2009. Out of 10 ways in which an individual could be victimized, the average number of ways of victimization experience for 2009 is 1.29, a decrease from 1.7 in 2005. From the 10 scenarios presented, the percentage of people who declared at least one experience with corruption has decreased from 66.5% in 2005 to 57.1% in 2009. Health represents the sector most quoted for bribery. 37.1% of respondents said that they had bribed a doctor or nurse during the last year.

FIGHTING CORRUPTION: Overall, the Albanian public reports that institutions are not doing enough to fight corruption. On a scale of 0-100 where 0 means “Does not help at all” and 100 means “Helps a lot”, the average score of all 9 institutions evaluated is 43.8 points. Only media is seen as contributing to the fight against corruption with 63.6 points, while all other institutions are evaluated with less than 50 points on the scale. Religious leaders, High Inspectorate for the Declaration and Audit of Assets and government, are seen as least helpful in the fight against corruption. Courts and the General Prosecutor’s office show an improvement of about 5 points and 6 points, respectively, from 2005 to 2009. However, both still have less than 50 points on the scale.

TRUST: Albanians’ trust in institutions continues to be low. The average score of trust for all 15 institutions presented to respondents is 44.3 points on a scale where 0 means “Do not trust at all” and 100 means “Trust a lot”. This score is also below mid-scale for public sector employees (48.8 points).

TRANSPARENCY: The public perceives institutions as not being transparent. None of the institutions evaluated received more than 50 points on a 0 to 100 scale, where 0 means “Not at all transparent” and 100 means “Fully transparent”. The most transparent institution, according to the general public, is local government, which still scores only 40.3 points. The least transparent institution is the Property Restitution and Compensation Agency with a score of 27.2 points.

CORRUPTION PHENOMENON UNDERSTANDING: When judging the two parties in a corrupt transaction, Albanians show more tolerance towards “givers” than towards “takers”. For example, a student who gives a shirt to the teacher with the hope of receiving a better grade is seen as either not corrupt (35.4%) or justified (34.7%). Similarly, a mother who pays 500 Leks for the certificates of her children to avoid staying in a queue is also seen as not corrupt (26.3%) or as largely justified (43.4%). There is a tendency from the Albanian public to include under the term “corruption” even phenomena that are generally not considered as corruption related. Asked about a flower vendor who raises the prices of flowers during holidays, almost half of respondents say that the vendor is corrupt and must be punished. Although this misconception has an impact on over-inflating the corruption perception, analyses show that the impact is rather low

JUDICIAL SYSTEM: 46.6% of the respondents have a lot or some trust in the judicial system. This is a 12 percentage point improvement from 2005 when 34.6% of the respondents had the same opinion. Almost three-quarters of citizens that have dealt with courts declared that the courts have treated them either “Very well” or “Well”. This represents a notable improvement from 2005 by almost 15 percentage points. 

ECONOMIC EVALUATION: More than half of the respondents (54.4%) think that the economic situation of the country is “Bad” or “Very bad”. Economic optimism, judged by the opinions of repondents on how the economic situation will be a year from now, is only slightly better than in 2008, but much less than the levels of the 2006 and 2005 surveys. One in four respondents replied that they are pessimistic about the country’s economic situation a year from now.

For the full report, please click here [PDF, 4MB]